Newsport Poll results telling, Douglas Shire residents willing to incur rates spike for very own Port Douglas lagoon pool

LAGOON RESULTS

Michael Warren

Editor

Email Michael
Last updated:
More than 150 voters would be willing to incur a rates spike to accommodate a future lagoon pool in Port Douglas. Screenshot: Michael Warren

More than 150 local residents are prepared to absorb a potential spike to their annual rates bill to enjoy the long term spoils of their very Douglas Shire lagoon pool after a Newsport poll reached its conclusion just a short time ago.

Last week, through a story and online poll we asked our readers:

If you knew in advance the construction, implementation and regular maintenance of a new port Douglas lagoon would incur a $200-300 increase to your annual rates bill would you still want the project to go ahead and become a permanent asset locals and tourists could enjoy for many years to come?

The results were telling; 63% of respondents, or 153 people voted yes, to being willing to accept higher rates to have a lagoon built in Port Douglas.

91 respondents or 37% of voters, chose no to absorbing a rates spike that directly relate to a lagoon project in Port Douglas.

In Council’s very own brochure released to Douglas Shire residents between February 17 to March 3 last year it said  any future lagoon in Port Douglas would have an approximate $25M capital cost, be around $2M annually to operate, and have a 5.3% impact on Douglas Shire rates.

Newsport has reached out to Douglas Shire Councillors for comment about the poll results.

 

 

Support public interest journalism

Help us to continue covering local stories that matter. Please consider supporting below.


Got a news tip?

Send a news tip or submit a letter to the Newsport Editor here.


Comments

Comments are the opinions of readers and do not represent the views of Newsport, its staff or affiliates. Reader comments are moderated before publication to promote valuable, civil, and healthy community debate. Visit our comment guidelines if your comment has not been approved for publication.