Douglas decides 24' - Fair play or grave disservice? a look into the electoral system

OPINION

Crispin Hull

Guest Columnist

Email Crispin
Last updated:
The local Government elections will be held on March 16. Picture: Newsport

Surely one of the takeaways from the Newsport-hosted candidates’ forum at the weekend is that the Queensland local government electoral system is about to do the residents of Douglas Shire a grave disservice.

A previous article outlined the defects of the first-past-the-post system for the four councillors. Essentially, too many voters get disenfranchised if none of their four chosen candidates are in the race when the last candidate is elected.

And even if a voter marks a ballot paper with a full list of preferences down to 10, only the first four get counted and they get counted with equal weight even if the voter is really keen on one chosen candidate and not so keen on the others.

But now to the other big defect: the separate election for the mayor.

The first problem with the separate election is that the shire will lose the services of one or more people who many voters would like to see on the council, even if not as mayor.

In this election, David Haratsis is new to the shire and is standing for mayor. He looks OK on paper and many voters might have liked him on the council but would be worried about a newbie going straight in as mayor. He nominated at the last minute.

Councillor Lisa Scomazzon is also standing for mayor. In the past term she was easily the best performer on council, especially in the last year, on my following of council meetings online. Most voters, of course, do not have the time or inclination to view council meetings. So, journalists try to do it for them.

Of all the councillors including Mayor Michael Kerr, to me she seemed to have the best grasp of the issues.

But under our present system, it is now inevitable that Douglas Shire will, on one hand, either lose the continuity and experience of Scomazzon and risk a newcomer stepping into the top role or, on the other hand, will not have the benefit of at least trying out a promising newcomer on the council.

Both of those potential losses could have been avoided with a better electoral system. We should have a full preferential voting system for all five positions on thecouncil and after the election, the councillors would choose the mayor – presumably starting with the candidate with the most votes.

And that leads us to the second defect of the separate mayoral election. At the last election Michael Kerr was directly elected mayor. As the term went on it became increasingly clear that a majority on the council were extremely dissatisfied and were especially concerned about communications and reliance on procedural technicalities to block councillors’ motions.

Three of them – Scomazzon, Abigail Noli and Roy Zammataro – successfully moved a no-confidence motion against him. Councillor Peter McKeown sided with Mayor Kerr.

But under the present electoral system, the motion had no effect. If, however, the council itself elected the mayor, the mayor would have been replaced by another Councillor but would have retained a place on the Council.

So, during the last council, the mayor and one other councillor could drive their agenda on things like water and the ferry and the other three were left relatively impotent but, to some extent, got tarred with the same brush and some of the blame for the failures of Council, despite doing their level best to improve things.

With a better electoral system some of the pain of the past four years would have been avoided. Most likely the defeated mayoral candidate in 2020, Julia Leu, would have retained a Council seat and the Council would have had someone to turn to when things did not turn out as well as voters would have hoped.

That loss of experience and knowledge was very damaging for Douglas Shire. And we should be mindful of the dangers of a repetition of it.

  • A reminder the views and opinions expressed in this piece are those of the author and author only and do not reflect those of the editor or Newsport staff.

Support public interest journalism

Help us to continue covering local stories that matter. Please consider supporting below.


Got a news tip?

Send a news tip or submit a letter to the Newsport Editor here.


Comments

Comments are the opinions of readers and do not represent the views of Newsport, its staff or affiliates. Reader comments are moderated before publication to promote valuable, civil, and healthy community debate. Visit our comment guidelines if your comment has not been approved for publication.